I’m going to say something that sounds dramatic and then spend the rest of this essay proving it: personal style barely exists right now. What we have instead is personal branding wearing personal style’s clothes.
I’ve asked before whether personal style even exists anymore, and back then I was still being polite about it. I’m less polite now. Because the longer I look at how people dress, online and off, the more I see the same thing. Outfits that are correct. Outfits that are on message. Outfits that would photograph well. And almost nothing that tells me who the person actually is.
Style is a diary. A brand is a pitch deck.
Here’s the difference as I see it. Personal style is what happens when you dress from the inside out. It’s messy, it changes, it has phases you’ll be embarrassed by later. It includes the weird jacket you love for no reason you can explain. Nobody has to understand it for it to work.
Personal branding is the opposite direction. You start from how you want to be read and work backwards. Clean girl. Old money. Quiet luxury. Office siren. Each one comes with a colour palette, a shopping list and a caption. A brand has to be consistent, recognisable and easy to summarise in three words, because that’s what makes it sellable. A person is none of those things.
And somewhere in the last few years we started treating the second thing as if it were the first. “Finding your personal style” now means picking which pre-made identity you’d like to subscribe to. That’s not finding anything. That’s choosing a template.
The algorithm dresses us now
I don’t think people woke up one day and decided to become boring. The system pushed us here. Social platforms reward what is instantly legible. An outfit that fits a known aesthetic gets saved, shared and recommended. An outfit that makes you tilt your head and go “wait, what is she doing?” gets scrolled past, because the feed doesn’t know where to file it.
So we learn. Quietly, without anyone telling us, we learn that the safe version performs better. Then the shopping apps learn what we clicked on and show us more of it. Then AI stylists and “what to wear” tools arrive, trained on the same pile of already popular images, and hand us back the average of everything. It’s a loop. Each round sands off a little more of whatever was strange and specific about us.
The result is that you can walk through any big city, in any country, and see the same outfit. Same wide-leg trouser, same little shoulder bag, same slicked bun. It’s not that the outfit is bad. It’s a perfectly nice outfit. It’s that ten thousand people independently arrived at it, and none of them really chose it.
People are scared, and I get it
This is the part I actually feel tender about. The lack of experimentation isn’t laziness. It’s fear.
Getting dressed used to have a small audience. Your college, your office, your neighbourhood aunties. If an outfit didn’t work, a few people saw it and everyone moved on. Now every outfit is potentially permanent. It can be photographed, posted, screenshotted and judged by strangers who will never think about you again but will absolutely leave a comment. When the cost of a bad outfit feels that high, of course people stop taking chances.
So we’ve become careful. Curated. We test an outfit in the mirror against an imaginary feed before we leave the house. We ask “is this giving what I want it to give?” instead of “do I like this?” Those are completely different questions, and only one of them leads to style.
Even the risk-taking is branded
What bothers me most is that even the rebellion has been packaged. “Weird girl” is an aesthetic. “Maximalist” is an aesthetic. “Unhinged styling” is a content format with its own hashtag. You can now buy the look of someone who doesn’t care, pre-assembled, from the same three websites.
A real risk is one where you don’t know how it will land. If the internet has already approved the “risk” and named it, you’re not taking one. You’re cosplaying someone who does.
I say this with love, because I’ve done it too. I’ve bought the thing because it fit the version of me I was trying to project that month. It sat in my cupboard like a costume from a play that got cancelled.
So how the hell do we build it back?
I don’t have a five-step plan, and I’d be suspicious of anyone who does, because a five-step plan for personal style is just another template. But I do have a few things I believe.
Dress for a day nobody will see. Wear the outfit you’re unsure about on a day with no photos. Go buy vegetables in it. See how it feels on your body when there’s no audience. Most of what you learn about your taste, you learn in private.
Notice what you keep, not what you save. Your saved folder is who you think you should be. The five things you actually wear until they fall apart are who you are. Start from those.
Let yourself be bad at it. Every person whose style you admire has years of terrible outfits behind them. The terrible outfits are the method. You can’t skip them by copying the finished result.
Look somewhere the algorithm isn’t. Old family photos. Films from before you were born. The way your grandmother pairs colours without thinking about it. Street markets. Anything that wasn’t optimised for engagement has more to teach you than your feed does.
Stop needing a name for it. If you can’t describe your style in a neat phrase, that’s a good sign. People aren’t supposed to be summarisable.
I’m not anti-brand. I’m anti-forgetting.
I run a magazine and I post online. I’d be lying if I said I never think about how things look from the outside. Presenting yourself well is not a sin, and for a lot of people it’s literally their job. My problem isn’t that personal branding exists. My problem is that it has eaten the thing it was supposed to sit next to.
A brand is something you maintain for other people. Style is something you have for yourself. You’re allowed to have both. But if you only have the first one, getting dressed stops being fun and starts being admin. And clothes were never meant to be admin.
So wear the confusing thing. Be off-brand. Disappoint the algorithm a little. It’ll survive.
Leave a Reply